Case-IH 9250 vs New Holland TJ-325

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1990–1995

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2001–2005

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 9250 and the TJ-325 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH 9250 and New Holland TJ-325, field by field
Field	9250	TJ-325	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	296.0 hp	321 hp	+8% TJ-325
Engine declared	CUMMINS LTA-10	CUMMINS 6 TAA-9304	differs
Displacement declared	10.01 L	8.85 L	+13% 9250
Maximum torque declared	977 lb·ft · 1,324 N·m	1,062 lb·ft · 1,440 N·m	+9% TJ-325
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Oil-immersed multi-plate clutch	Pedal-operated electrohydraulic wet multi-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	27.8 gpm · 105.2 L/min	40.9 gpm · 154.8 L/min	+47% TJ-325
Pressure declared	2,306 psi · 159 bar	2,596–2,698 psi · 179–186 bar	differs
Three-point lift at ends declared	14,074 lb · 6,384 kg	15,673 lb · 7,109 kg	+11% TJ-325
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	30,060 lb · 13,635 kg	31,934 lb · 14,485 kg	+6% TJ-325
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	39,022 lb · 17,700 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	130.0 in · 3,302 mm	139.0 in · 3,531 mm	+7% TJ-325
Length declared	264.0 in · 6,706 mm	276.0 in · 7,010 mm	—
Width declared	119.5 in · 3,035 mm	120.0 in · 3,048 mm	—
Height declared	139.1 in · 3,532 mm	137.0 in · 3,480 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	14.8 in · 377 mm	13.0 in · 330 mm	+14% 9250
Fuel tank declared	799.9 qt · 757.0 L	799.9 qt · 757.0 L	—

Source

Source