Case-IH 845 XL (A) or Landini 8800 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Landini 8800 (DT): hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Landini 8800 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 58% (18.9 L/min / 5.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 845 XL (A) and Landini 8800 (DT), with the call on each
Question845 XL (A)8800 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?48.5 kW (65.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”48.3 kW (64.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8800 DT”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 845 XL (A) and the 8800 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 845 XL (A) and the 8800 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.6 L/min (8.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”51.5 L/min (13.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8800 DT”AheadThe Landini 8800 (DT) has 58% more hydraulic flow (18.9 L/min / 5.0 gpm) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,150 kg (6,945 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”3,355 kg (7,397 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8800 DT”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,660 kg (8,069 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”3,820 kg (8,422 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8800 DT”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8800 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”32Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8800 DT”AheadThe Landini 8800 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 845 XL (A) and the 8800 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 8800 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 8800 DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 8800 DT”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 845XL”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 8800 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19961987–2000EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Landini 8800 (DT) has 58% more hydraulic flow (18.9 L/min / 5.0 gpm) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 8800 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Case-IH 845 XL (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources