Case-IH 5240 (DT) or Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30: three-point lift.
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 14% (652 kg / 1,437 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5240 (DT) | DX 6.30 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 75.6 kW (101.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240” | 75.5 kW (101.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5240 (DT) and the DX 6.30. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5240 (DT) and the DX 6.30. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 60.4 L/min (16.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 5240 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,548 kg (10,027 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240” | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30 has 14% more lift (652 kg / 1,437 lb) than the Case-IH 5240 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,590 kg (10,119 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240” | 4,840 kg (10,670 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5240 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240” | 15 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5240 (DT) and the DX 6.30. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 5240 (DT). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5240” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1989–1997 | 1983–1990 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 5240 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 6.30 has 14% more lift (652 kg / 1,437 lb) than the Case-IH 5240 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH 5240 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources