Case-IH 5230 (DT) or Hürlimann 909 XT?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH 5230 (DT): hydraulic flow. On features, the Hürlimann 909 XT is ahead on forward gears.

  • The Case-IH 5230 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (14.3 L/min / 3.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 5230 (DT) and Hürlimann 909 XT, with the call on each
Question5230 (DT)909 XTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?67.7 kW (90.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”67.4 kW (90.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5230 (DT) and the 909 XT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5230 (DT) and the 909 XT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?75.3 L/min (19.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”61.0 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”AheadThe Case-IH 5230 (DT) has 23% more hydraulic flow (14.3 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann 909 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,477 kg (9,870 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 5230 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”); the 909 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,480 kg (9,877 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5230 (DT) and the 909 XT.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”45 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”AheadThe Hürlimann 909 XT has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the Case-IH 5230 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5230 (DT) and the 909 XT.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 909 XT.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1989–19971995–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann 909 XT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH 5230 (DT) has 23% more hydraulic flow (14.3 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann 909 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann 909 XT has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the Case-IH 5230 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann 909 XT is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 5230 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”); the 909 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources