Case-IH 5230 (DT) or Fiat 1000 Super (TD)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH 5230 (DT): three-point lift.

  • The Case-IH 5230 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 40% (1,277 kg / 2,815 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 5230 (DT) and Fiat 1000 Super (TD), with the call on each
Question5230 (DT)1000 Super (TD)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?67.7 kW (90.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”67.7 kW (90.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1000-S/1000-S DT”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5230 (DT) and the 1000 Super (TD).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5230 (DT) and the 1000 Super (TD).
Which pumps more oil for implements?75.3 L/min (19.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1000 Super (TD).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,477 kg (9,870 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1000-S/1000-S DT”AheadThe Case-IH 5230 (DT) has 40% more lift (1,277 kg / 2,815 lb) than the Fiat 1000 Super (TD) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,480 kg (9,877 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”3,620 kg (7,981 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1000-S/1000-S DT”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 5230 (DT) is 24% heavier (860 kg / 1,896 lb) than the Fiat 1000 Super (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,380 kg (14,065 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1000-S/1000-S DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5230 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1000-S/1000-S DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5230 (DT) and the 1000 Super (TD).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1000-S/1000-S DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1000-S/1000-S DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1000-S/1000-S DT”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 5230”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1000-S/1000-S DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1989–19971976–1979Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 5230 (DT) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH 5230 (DT) has 40% more lift (1,277 kg / 2,815 lb) than the Fiat 1000 Super (TD) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 5230 (DT) is 24% heavier (860 kg / 1,896 lb) than the Fiat 1000 Super (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 5230 (DT) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources