Case-IH 3210 or SAME 45 DT?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH 3210: three-point lift. It is also ahead on top speed.

  • The Case-IH 3210 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 104% (1,250 kg / 2,756 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Case-IH 3210 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH 3210 and SAME 45 DT, with the call on each
Question321045 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?25.9 kW (34.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 3210”26.1 kW (35.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 45”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3210 and the 45 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3210 and the 45 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 45”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 3210.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,450 kg (5,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 3210”1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 45”AheadThe Case-IH 3210 has 104% more lift (1,250 kg / 2,756 lb) than the SAME 45 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 3210”1,010 kg (2,227 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 45”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH 3210 is 169% heavier (1,710 kg / 3,770 lb) than the SAME 45 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 45”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3210.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 3210”12Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 45”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 3210 and the 45 DT.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 3210”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 45”AheadThe Case-IH 3210 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SAME 45 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 3210”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 45”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 3210”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 45 DT.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 3210”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Solaris 45”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19981992–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH 3210 has 104% more lift (1,250 kg / 2,756 lb) than the SAME 45 DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 3210 is 169% heavier (1,710 kg / 3,770 lb) than the SAME 45 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH 3210 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the SAME 45 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources