BUKH 302 (Super) vs Warchalowski WT-33 B
9 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 302 (Super) and the WT-33 B → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
9 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 302 (Super) | WT-33 B | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 29.6 hp | 29.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | BUKH 2 EV-100 or 2 G 105 | WARCHALOWSKI D-32 | differs |
| Displacement declared | — | 1.62 L | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 14.3 mph · 23 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +30% WT-33 B |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal operated two stage dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 2,425 lb · 1,100 kg | 2,822 lb · 1,280 kg | +16% WT-33 B |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,699 lb · 1,678 kg | 3,042 lb · 1,380 kg | +22% 302 (Super) |
| Wheelbase declared | 74.4 in · 1,890 mm | 81.1 in · 2,060 mm | +9% WT-33 B |
| Length declared | 116.7 in · 2,965 mm | 120.5 in · 3,060 mm | — |
| Width declared | 64.2 in · 1,630 mm | 59.1 in · 1,500 mm | +9% 302 (Super) |
| Height declared | 60.6 in · 1,540 mm | 55.1 in · 1,400 mm | +10% 302 (Super) |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.7 in · 400 mm | 14.6 in · 370 mm | +8% 302 (Super) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.2 ft · 2.50 m | 9.0 ft · 2.75 m | +10% WT-33 B |
| Fuel tank declared | 37.0 qt · 35.0 L | 38.0 qt · 36.0 L | — |
BUKH 302 (Super) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302”
Warchalowski WT-33 B sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 33B”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 38”