BUKH 302 (Super) vs Renault E 30
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 302 (Super) and the E 30 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 302 (Super) | E 30 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 29.6 hp | 29.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | BUKH 2 EV-100 or 2 G 105 | RENAULT 668/12 | differs |
| Displacement declared | — | 2.00 L | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 14.3 mph · 23 km/h | 15.5 mph · 25 km/h | +9% E 30 |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal-operated dry FERODO single-plate clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min | 3.4 gpm · 13.0 L/min | +23% 302 (Super) |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 2,425 lb · 1,100 kg | 2,866 lb · 1,300 kg | +18% E 30 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,699 lb · 1,678 kg | 3,274 lb · 1,485 kg | +13% 302 (Super) |
| Wheelbase declared | 74.4 in · 1,890 mm | 69.8 in · 1,772 mm | +7% 302 (Super) |
| Length declared | 116.7 in · 2,965 mm | 123.2 in · 3,130 mm | +6% E 30 |
| Width declared | 64.2 in · 1,630 mm | 61.8 in · 1,570 mm | — |
| Height declared | 60.6 in · 1,540 mm | 60.6 in · 1,540 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.7 in · 400 mm | 14.6 in · 370 mm | +8% 302 (Super) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.2 ft · 2.50 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 37.0 qt · 35.0 L | 42.3 qt · 40.0 L | +14% E 30 |
BUKH 302 (Super) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302”
Renault E 30 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault E30 R3050/R3051”