BUKH 302 (Super) or International Harvester D-430 Standard?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 302 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-430 Standard has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The BUKH 302 (Super) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 83% (500 kg / 1,102 lb) more three-point lift.
- The BUKH 302 (Super) suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 302 (Super) | D-430 Standard | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 22.1 kW (29.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | 22.1 kW (29.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 302 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-430 Standard has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 302 (Super) and the D-430 Standard. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 302 (Super) and the D-430 Standard. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 16.0 L/min (4.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | 15.5 L/min (4.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,100 kg (2,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | 600 kg (1,323 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | AheadThe BUKH 302 (Super) has 83% more lift (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the International Harvester D-430 Standard (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,678 kg (3,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | 1,543 kg (3,402 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 302 (Super). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-430 Standard. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | AheadThe BUKH 302 (Super) has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the International Harvester D-430 Standard (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | AheadThe BUKH 302 (Super) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester D-430 Standard does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bukh Super 302” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick D-430 Standard” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1960–1967 | 1958–1962 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The BUKH 302 (Super) has 83% more lift (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the International Harvester D-430 Standard (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The BUKH 302 (Super) has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the International Harvester D-430 Standard (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The BUKH 302 (Super) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the International Harvester D-430 Standard does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 302 (Super) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-430 Standard has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources