BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 or Lanz D 9006?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 is ahead on top speed.
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 suits road haulage better on this data: 61% (11.4 km/h / 7.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | BM-55 | D 9006 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 28.7 kW (38.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 29.4 kW (39 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the BM-55 and the D 9006. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the BM-55 and the D 9006. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.8 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 9006. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 9006. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,241 kg (7,145 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the BM-55 and the D 9006. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the BM-55 and the D 9006. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 18.6 km/h (11.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | AheadThe BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 has 61% more top speed (11.4 km/h / 7.1 mph) than the Lanz D 9006 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 630Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 9006. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the BM-55 and the D 9006. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 55” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 9006 Reingas” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1953–1959 | 1943–1945 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 has 61% more top speed (11.4 km/h / 7.1 mph) than the Lanz D 9006 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-55 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources