BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-32 or Fordson New Major (E1A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the BM-32 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the New Major (E1A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-32 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (5.3 L/min / 1.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-32 suits road haulage better on this data: 36% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | BM-32 | New Major (E1A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 28.7 kW (38.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 32” | 29.4 kW (39.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson New Major” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the BM-32 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the New Major (E1A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the BM-32 and the New Major (E1A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the BM-32 and the New Major (E1A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 23.8 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 32” | 18.5 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson New Major” | AheadThe BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-32 has 29% more hydraulic flow (5.3 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Fordson New Major (E1A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 950 kg (2,094 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson New Major” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the BM-32. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,295 kg (5,060 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 32” | 2,070 kg (4,564 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson New Major” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-32 is 11% heavier (225 kg / 496 lb) than the Fordson New Major (E1A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the BM-32 and the New Major (E1A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 32” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson New Major” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the BM-32 and the New Major (E1A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 32” | 22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson New Major” | AheadThe BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-32 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Fordson New Major (E1A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 32” | 542 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fordson New Major” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the New Major (E1A). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the BM-32 and the New Major (E1A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell BM 32” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fordson New Major” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1950–1957 | 1951–1958 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-32 has 29% more hydraulic flow (5.3 L/min / 1.4 gpm) than the Fordson New Major (E1A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-32 is 11% heavier (225 kg / 496 lb) than the Fordson New Major (E1A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The BOLINDER-MUNKTELL BM-32 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Fordson New Major (E1A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the BM-32 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the New Major (E1A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources