ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler or SOMECA 1380 (TD)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 220 Landhandler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1380 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 220 Landhandler | 1380 (TD) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 101.5 kW (136.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220” | 99.3 kW (133.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1380” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 220 Landhandler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1380 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 220 Landhandler and the 1380 (TD). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 220 Landhandler and the 1380 (TD). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 62.5 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220” | 53.5 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1380” | AheadThe ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler has 17% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the SOMECA 1380 (TD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220” | 4,934 kg (10,878 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1380” | AheadThe SOMECA 1380 (TD) has 81% more lift (2,212 kg / 4,877 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,516 kg (12,161 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220” | 4,875 kg (10,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1380” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler is 13% heavier (641 kg / 1,413 lb) than the SOMECA 1380 (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,650 kg (19,070 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1380” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 220 Landhandler. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1380” | AheadThe SOMECA 1380 (TD) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 220 Landhandler and the 1380 (TD). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Someca 1380” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 1380” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 220 Landhandler and the 1380 (TD). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Someca 1380” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1969–1973 | 1979–1983 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SOMECA 1380 (TD) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler has 17% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the SOMECA 1380 (TD) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The SOMECA 1380 (TD) has 81% more lift (2,212 kg / 4,877 lb) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler is 13% heavier (641 kg / 1,413 lb) than the SOMECA 1380 (TD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The SOMECA 1380 (TD) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The SOMECA 1380 (TD) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 220 Landhandler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1380 (TD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources