ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler or Fiat 140-90 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 220 Landhandler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 140-90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (11.7 L/min / 3.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler and Fiat 140-90 (DT), with the call on each
Question220 Landhandler140-90 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?101.5 kW (136.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”103 kW (138 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 220 Landhandler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 140-90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 220 Landhandler and the 140-90 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 220 Landhandler and the 140-90 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?62.5 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”50.8 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”AheadThe ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler has 23% more hydraulic flow (11.7 L/min / 3.1 gpm) than the Fiat 140-90 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 220 Landhandler: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”); the 140-90 (DT): lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,516 kg (12,161 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”5,810 kg (12,809 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?—9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 220 Landhandler.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”AheadThe Fiat 140-90 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 220 Landhandler.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”AheadThe Fiat 140-90 (DT) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 220 Landhandler and the 140-90 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1969–19731984–1993Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 140-90 (DT) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler has 23% more hydraulic flow (11.7 L/min / 3.1 gpm) than the Fiat 140-90 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 140-90 (DT) has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 140-90 (DT) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the ALLIS-CHALMERS 220 Landhandler does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fiat 140-90 (DT) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 220 Landhandler has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 140-90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 220 Landhandler: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Allis-Chalmers 220”); the 140-90 (DT): lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 140-90 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources