AGRIFULL Tornado 80 (DT) or Hürlimann 7700?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Tornado 80 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Hürlimann 7700 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (447 kg / 985 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Tornado 80 (DT) | 7700 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 56.6 kW (75.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Tornedo 80” | 56.6 kW (75.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann 7700” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Tornado 80 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Tornado 80 (DT) and the 7700. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Tornado 80 (DT) and the 7700. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Tornedo 80” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 7700. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,963 kg (4,328 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Tornedo 80” | 2,410 kg (5,313 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann 7700” | AheadThe Hürlimann 7700 has 23% more lift (447 kg / 985 lb) than the AGRIFULL Tornado 80 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,196 kg (7,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Tornedo 80” | 2,930 kg (6,460 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann 7700” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Tornado 80 (DT) and the 7700. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Tornedo 80” | 10 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann 7700” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Tornado 80 (DT) and the 7700. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Tornedo 80” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann 7700” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Tornedo 80” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann 7700” | AheadThe AGRIFULL Tornado 80 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann 7700 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Tornedo 80” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 7700. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull Tornedo 80” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann 7700” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1977–1980 | 1976–1978 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann 7700 has 23% more lift (447 kg / 985 lb) than the AGRIFULL Tornado 80 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL Tornado 80 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann 7700 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Tornado 80 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7700 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources