AGRIFULL 80-75 (DT) or Case-IH CS-78 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80-75 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the CS-78 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH CS-78 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 68% (20.5 L/min / 5.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Case-IH CS-78 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80-75 (DT) | CS-78 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 57.4 kW (77.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-75” | 57.4 kW (77.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS78” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-75 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the CS-78 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-75 (DT) and the CS-78 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-75 (DT) and the CS-78 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-75” | 50.5 L/min (13.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS78” | AheadThe Case-IH CS-78 (A) has 68% more hydraulic flow (20.5 L/min / 5.4 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-75 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 80-75 (DT) and the CS-78 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,950 kg (6,504 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-75” | 3,370 kg (7,430 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS78” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CS-78 (A) is 14% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-75 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS78” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-75 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-75” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS78” | AheadThe Case-IH CS-78 (A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the AGRIFULL 80-75 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-75 (DT) and the CS-78 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-75” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS78” | AheadThe Case-IH CS-78 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-75 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-75” | 390/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS78” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-75” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the CS-78 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-75” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH CS78” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1980–1986 | 1995–2003 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH CS-78 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH CS-78 (A) has 68% more hydraulic flow (20.5 L/min / 5.4 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-75 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CS-78 (A) is 14% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the AGRIFULL 80-75 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CS-78 (A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the AGRIFULL 80-75 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CS-78 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-75 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH CS-78 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-75 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the CS-78 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources