AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) or Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 80-60 F (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 203 V/VA-II has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 80-60 F (DT) | Farmer 203 V/VA-II | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 42 kW (56 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-60 F (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 203 V/VA-II has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 80-60 F (DT) and the Farmer 203 V/VA-II. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 80-60 F (DT) and the Farmer 203 V/VA-II. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 27.0 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II has 23% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 80-60 F (DT) and the Farmer 203 V/VA-II. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,155 kg (4,751 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 1,715 kg (3,781 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) is 26% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 80-60 F (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | — | No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the Farmer 203 V/VA-II. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 80-60 F (DT) and the Farmer 203 V/VA-II. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-60 F” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1980–1986 | 1984–1988 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II has 23% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) is 26% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 203 V/VA-II has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-60 F (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 80-60 F (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 203 V/VA-II has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, forward gears and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources