Agco RT-95 or New Holland T 5050?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 5050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | RT-95 | T 5050 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 71.3 kW (95.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 71.3 kW (95.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 5050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-95 and the T 5050. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-95 and the T 5050. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 111.3 L/min (29.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 66.1 L/min (17.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | AheadThe Agco RT-95 has 68% more hydraulic flow (45.2 L/min / 11.9 gpm) than the New Holland T 5050 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,339 kg (7,361 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 5,740 kg (12,655 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | AheadThe New Holland T 5050 has 72% more lift (2,401 kg / 5,293 lb) than the Agco RT-95 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,717 kg (10,399 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 3,705 kg (8,168 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-95 is 27% heavier (1,012 kg / 2,231 lb) than the New Holland T 5050 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-95. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 32Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | AheadThe Agco RT-95 has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the New Holland T 5050 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-95. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5050” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 2008–2012 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 5050 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco RT-95 has 68% more hydraulic flow (45.2 L/min / 11.9 gpm) than the New Holland T 5050 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 5050 has 72% more lift (2,401 kg / 5,293 lb) than the Agco RT-95 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-95 is 27% heavier (1,012 kg / 2,231 lb) than the New Holland T 5050 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-95 has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the New Holland T 5050 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 5050 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 5050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources