Agco RT-95 or Landini 10800 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10800 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco RT-95 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | RT-95 | 10800 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 71.3 kW (95.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 71.4 kW (95.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10800 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-95 and the 10800 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-95 and the 10800 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 111.3 L/min (29.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 51.2 L/min (13.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | AheadThe Agco RT-95 has 117% more hydraulic flow (60.1 L/min / 15.9 gpm) than the Landini 10800 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,339 kg (7,361 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | AheadThe Landini 10800 (DT) has 35% more lift (1,161 kg / 2,560 lb) than the Agco RT-95 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,717 kg (10,399 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-95. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 32Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-95 and the 10800 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | AheadThe Agco RT-95 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Landini 10800 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 95” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 10800 DT” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 1987–2000 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-95 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco RT-95 has 117% more hydraulic flow (60.1 L/min / 15.9 gpm) than the Landini 10800 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Landini 10800 (DT) has 35% more lift (1,161 kg / 2,560 lb) than the Agco RT-95 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-95 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Landini 10800 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-95 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10800 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources