Agco RT 180 A vs Massey Ferguson MF 8260 A
6 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the RT 180 A and the MF 8260 A → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
6 material differences · 10 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | RT 180 A | MF 8260 A | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 209.1 hp | 207.3 hp | — |
| Engine declared | SISU-DIESEL 74 CTA-4V | VALMET 634 DSBAE | differs |
| Displacement declared | 7.37 L | 7.37 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 652 lb·ft · 884 N·m | 628 lb·ft · 852 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal operated hydraulic FUNK multi-disc clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 30.8 gpm · 116.6 L/min | 33.1 gpm · 125.2 L/min | +7% MF 8260 A |
| Pressure declared | 3,336 psi · 230 bar | 3,205 psi · 221 bar | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 14,546 lb · 6,598 kg | 22,931 lb · 10,401 kg | +58% MF 8260 A |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 17,461 lb · 7,920 kg | 17,990 lb · 8,160 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 118.0 in · 2,996 mm | 121.5 in · 3,087 mm | — |
| Length declared | 210.0 in · 5,334 mm | 206.3 in · 5,240 mm | — |
| Width declared | 79.1 in · 2,009 mm | 99.1 in · 2,518 mm | +25% MF 8260 A |
| Height declared | 122.0 in · 3,099 mm | 120.8 in · 3,068 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 22.4 in · 570 mm | 16.7 in · 425 mm | +34% RT 180 A |
| Fuel tank declared | 399.4 qt · 378.0 L | 433.2 qt · 410 L | +8% MF 8260 A |
Agco RT 180 A sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A”
Massey Ferguson MF 8260 A sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8260”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8250”