Agco RT 180 A or Fendt 924 Vario?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT 180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 924 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt 924 Vario suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | RT 180 A | 924 Vario | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 155.9 kW (209.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | 154 kW (207 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 924 Vario” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT 180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 924 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT 180 A and the 924 Vario. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT 180 A and the 924 Vario. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 116.6 L/min (30.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 924 Vario. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,598 kg (14,546 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 924 Vario. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,920 kg (17,461 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | 10,080 kg (22,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 924 Vario” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt 924 Vario is 27% heavier (2,160 kg / 4,762 lb) than the Agco RT 180 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 15,000 kg (33,069 lb) to 18,000 kg (39,683 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 924 Vario” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT 180 A. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 924 Vario” | EvenEven on gears: every machine is stepless. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT 180 A and the 924 Vario. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | 50 km/h (31.1 mph) to 60 km/h (37.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 924 Vario” | AheadThe Fendt 924 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Agco RT 180 A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | — | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 924 Vario. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 924 Vario. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 924 Vario”; OECD test report 2545, 2010 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2009–2011 | 2006–2014 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt 924 Vario is 27% heavier (2,160 kg / 4,762 lb) than the Agco RT 180 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt 924 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Agco RT 180 A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on gears: every machine is stepless.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT 180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 924 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources