Agco LT-70 or Fendt 370 GT?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the LT-70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 370 GT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco LT-70 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The Fendt 370 GT suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | LT-70 | 370 GT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 52.2 kW (70.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70” | 52 kW (70 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 370 GT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the LT-70 and the 370 GT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the LT-70 and the 370 GT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.1 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70” | 40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,518 kg (3,347 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70” | 3,270 kg (7,209 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the LT-70: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70”); the 370 GT: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,697 kg (8,150 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70” | 3,590 kg (7,915 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,290 kg (11,662 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the LT-70. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70” | 21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the LT-70 and the 370 GT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | AheadThe Fendt 370 GT has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Agco LT-70 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70” | 540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | AheadThe Fendt 370 GT offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco LT-70 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT” | AheadThe Agco LT-70 is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt 370 GT is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 1996–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco LT-70 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt 370 GT has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Agco LT-70 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt 370 GT offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco LT-70 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Agco LT-70 is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt 370 GT is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Agco LT-70 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 370 GT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the LT-70: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 70”); the 370 GT: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources