Agco GT-55 vs Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2004–2007

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1997–2001

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the GT-55 and the MF 4225 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco GT-55 and Massey Ferguson MF 4225 (A), field by field
Field	GT-55	MF 4225 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	66.1 hp	64.1 hp	—
Engine declared	SAME-DEUTZ-FAHR 1000.3 WT 3-E	Perkins 4.41	differs
Displacement declared	3.00 L	4.08 L	+36% MF 4225 (A)
Maximum torque declared	184 lb·ft · 250 N·m	—	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Pedal operated dry and air cooled single plate clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Open centre	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	12.5 gpm · 47.3 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	3,118 psi · 215 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	3,803 lb · 1,725 kg	5,401 lb · 2,450 kg	+42% MF 4225 (A)
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,509 lb · 2,499 kg	7,694 lb · 3,490 kg	+40% MF 4225 (A)
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	14,330 lb · 6,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	82.9 in · 2,105 mm	92.5 in · 2,350 mm	+12% MF 4225 (A)
Length declared	146.5 in · 3,720 mm	151.6 in · 3,850 mm	—
Width declared	75.6 in · 1,920 mm	78.3 in · 1,990 mm	—
Height declared	104.6 in · 2,657 mm	97.2 in · 2,468 mm	+8% GT-55
Ground clearance declared	17.5 in · 445 mm	10.6 in · 270 mm	+65% GT-55
Turning radius, braked declared	10.0 ft · 3.06 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	94.8 qt · 89.7 L	88.8 qt · 84.0 L	+7% GT-55

Source

Source