Agco GT-45 or VALMET 255 (255-4)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the GT-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 255 (255-4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Agco GT-45 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 120% (46.9 L/min / 12.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco GT-45 and VALMET 255 (255-4), with the call on each
QuestionGT-45255 (255-4)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”39 kW (52 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 255 (255-4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the GT-45 and the 255 (255-4).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the GT-45 and the 255 (255-4).
Which pumps more oil for implements?85.9 L/min (22.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”39.0 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”AheadThe Agco GT-45 has 120% more hydraulic flow (46.9 L/min / 12.4 gpm) than the VALMET 255 (255-4) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,597 kg (3,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”2,580 kg (5,688 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the GT-45: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”); the 255 (255-4): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,419 kg (5,333 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”2,820 kg (6,217 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 255 (255-4) is 17% heavier (401 kg / 884 lb) than the Agco GT-45 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the GT-45 and the 255 (255-4).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”AheadThe Agco GT-45 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the VALMET 255 (255-4) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the GT-45 and the 255 (255-4).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20071992–1994Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco GT-45 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco GT-45 has 120% more hydraulic flow (46.9 L/min / 12.4 gpm) than the VALMET 255 (255-4) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 255 (255-4) is 17% heavier (401 kg / 884 lb) than the Agco GT-45 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco GT-45 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the VALMET 255 (255-4) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco GT-45 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 255 (255-4) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the GT-45: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”); the 255 (255-4): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 255”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources