Agco DT-225 or Fendt 722 Vario?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-225 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 722 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt 722 Vario suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco DT-225 and Fendt 722 Vario, with the call on each
QuestionDT-225722 VarioCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?167.7 kW (224.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”163 kW (219 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-225 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 722 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-225 and the 722 Vario.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-225 and the 722 Vario.
Which pumps more oil for implements?113.2 L/min (29.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”109.0 L/min (28.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,940 kg (19,709 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”9,769 kg (21,537 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the DT-225: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”); the 722 Vario: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?8,956 kg (19,745 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”7,900 kg (17,417 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-225 is 13% heavier (1,056 kg / 2,328 lb) than the Fendt 722 Vario (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the DT-225 and the 722 Vario.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-225 has 18 forward gears and the Fendt 722 Vario is stepless (CVT) — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-225 and the 722 Vario.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”AheadThe Fendt 722 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Agco DT-225 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”AheadThe Fendt 722 Vario offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco DT-225 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the DT-225 and the 722 Vario.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2002–20042011–Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt 722 Vario is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco DT-225 is 13% heavier (1,056 kg / 2,328 lb) than the Fendt 722 Vario (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 722 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Agco DT-225 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 722 Vario offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco DT-225 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fendt 722 Vario is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-225 has 18 forward gears and the Fendt 722 Vario is stepless (CVT) — not called.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-225 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 722 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the DT-225: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225”); the 722 Vario: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 722 Vario”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources