Agco DT-225 B or Case-IH MX 255?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-225 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MX 255 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | DT-225 B | MX 255 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 194.9 kW (261.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225 B” | 192.7 kW (258.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-225 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MX 255 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-225 B and the MX 255. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-225 B and the MX 255. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 105.5 L/min (27.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225 B” | 146.1 L/min (38.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 255 has 38% more hydraulic flow (40.6 L/min / 10.7 gpm) than the Agco DT-225B (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 11,156 kg (24,595 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225 B” | 8,137 kg (17,939 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255” | AheadThe Agco DT-225B has 37% more lift (3,019 kg / 6,656 lb) than the Case-IH MX 255 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 11,720 kg (25,838 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225 B” | 9,779 kg (21,559 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-225B is 20% heavier (1,941 kg / 4,279 lb) than the Case-IH MX 255 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the DT-225 B. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225 B” | 18 to 24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-225B is stepless (CVT) and the Case-IH MX 255 has 18 to 24 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-225 B and the MX 255. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225 B” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225 B” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255” | Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the MX 255. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225 B” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225 B” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX255”; OECD test report 2188, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2009–2010 | 2002–2005 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-225B is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MX 255 has 38% more hydraulic flow (40.6 L/min / 10.7 gpm) than the Agco DT-225B (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-225B has 37% more lift (3,019 kg / 6,656 lb) than the Case-IH MX 255 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-225B is 20% heavier (1,941 kg / 4,279 lb) than the Case-IH MX 255 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-225B is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-225B is stepless (CVT) and the Case-IH MX 255 has 18 to 24 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-225 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MX 255 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the MX 255.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources