Agco DT-220 A or John Deere 8320 T?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-220 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8320 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Agco DT-220 A suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco DT-220 A and John Deere 8320 T, with the call on each
QuestionDT-220 A8320 TCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?191.2 kW (256.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”184 kW (247 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-220 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8320 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-220 A and the 8320 T.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-220 A and the 8320 T.
Which pumps more oil for implements?139.8 L/min (36.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”131.0 L/min (34.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,644 kg (14,648 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the DT-220 A: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”); the 8320 T: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”12,127 kg (26,735 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8320 T is 31% heavier (2,887 kg / 6,365 lb) than the Agco DT-220 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”14,288 kg (31,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”16 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-220 A is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 8320 T has 16 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-220 A and the 8320 T.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”AheadThe Agco DT-220 A has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8320 T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the 8320 T.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”TracksTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”; OECD test report 2043, 2003DifferDrive differs: the Agco DT-220 A 4WD and the John Deere 8320 T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2005–20082002–2005EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 8320 T is 31% heavier (2,887 kg / 6,365 lb) than the Agco DT-220 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-220 A has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8320 T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-220 A is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 8320 T has 16 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Drive differs: the Agco DT-220 A 4WD and the John Deere 8320 T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-220 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8320 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the DT-220 A: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”); the 8320 T: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8320T”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the 8320 T.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources