Agco DT-220 A or Fendt Favorit 926 Vario?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-220 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 926 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco DT-220 A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 37% (37.8 L/min / 10.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | DT-220 A | Favorit 926 Vario | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 191.2 kW (256.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | 191 kW (256 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 926 Vario” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-220 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 926 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-220 A and the Favorit 926 Vario. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-220 A and the Favorit 926 Vario. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 139.8 L/min (36.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | 102.0 L/min (26.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 926 Vario” | AheadThe Agco DT-220 A has 37% more hydraulic flow (37.8 L/min / 10.0 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 926 Vario (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,644 kg (14,648 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Favorit 926 Vario. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | 8,250 kg (18,188 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 926 Vario” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-220 A is 12% heavier (990 kg / 2,183 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 926 Vario (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 926 Vario” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 926 Vario” | EvenEven on gears: every machine is stepless. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-220 A and the Favorit 926 Vario. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 926 Vario” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | 750 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 926 Vario” | DifferPTO speeds differ: the Agco DT-220 A 540/1000 rpm and the Fendt Favorit 926 Vario 750/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 926 Vario. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 926 Vario” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2005–2008 | 1996–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-220 A is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco DT-220 A has 37% more hydraulic flow (37.8 L/min / 10.0 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 926 Vario (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-220 A is 12% heavier (990 kg / 2,183 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 926 Vario (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-220 A is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on gears: every machine is stepless.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- PTO speeds differ: the Agco DT-220 A 540/1000 rpm and the Fendt Favorit 926 Vario 750/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-220 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 926 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources