Agco DT-200 A or John Deere 8310?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-200 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco DT-200 A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (21.1 L/min / 5.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 26% (1,362 kg / 3,002 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | DT-200 A | 8310 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 172.8 kW (231.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | 173 kW (232 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-200 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-200 A and the 8310. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-200 A and the 8310. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 141.5 L/min (37.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | 120.4 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310” | AheadThe Agco DT-200 A has 18% more hydraulic flow (21.1 L/min / 5.6 gpm) than the John Deere 8310 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,644 kg (14,648 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | 5,282 kg (11,645 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310” | AheadThe Agco DT-200 A has 26% more lift (1,362 kg / 3,002 lb) than the John Deere 8310 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,680 kg (19,136 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | 9,010 kg (19,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | 16 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-200 A is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 8310 has 16 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-200 A and the 8310. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200 A” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8310”; OECD test report 1932, 2000 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2005–2008 | 1999–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-200 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco DT-200 A has 18% more hydraulic flow (21.1 L/min / 5.6 gpm) than the John Deere 8310 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-200 A has 26% more lift (1,362 kg / 3,002 lb) than the John Deere 8310 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-200 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-200 A is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 8310 has 16 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-200 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8310 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources