Agco DT-180 A or Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7230 PRO/8930 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Agco DT-180A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 26% (29.1 L/min / 7.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Agco DT-180A suits road haulage better on this data: 21% (2,425 kg / 5,346 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco DT-180 A and Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930, with the call on each
QuestionDT-180 A7230 PRO/8930Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?158.1 kW (212.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A”157.4 kW (211.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7230 PRO/8930 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-180 A and the 7230 PRO/8930.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-180 A and the 7230 PRO/8930.
Which pumps more oil for implements?141.5 L/min (37.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A”112.4 L/min (29.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”AheadThe Agco DT-180A has 26% more hydraulic flow (29.1 L/min / 7.7 gpm) than the Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,644 kg (14,648 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A”6,137 kg (13,530 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?9,030 kg (19,908 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A”8,103 kg (17,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-180A is 11% heavier (927 kg / 2,044 lb) than the Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A”11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”AheadThe Agco DT-180A has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (2,425 kg / 5,346 lb) than the Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A”24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-180A is stepless (CVT) and the Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 has 24 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-180 A.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the DT-180 A and the 7230 PRO/8930.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2005–20081997–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-180A is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco DT-180A has 26% more hydraulic flow (29.1 L/min / 7.7 gpm) than the Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-180A is 11% heavier (927 kg / 2,044 lb) than the Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-180A has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (2,425 kg / 5,346 lb) than the Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-180A is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-180A is stepless (CVT) and the Case-IH 7230 PRO/8930 has 24 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7230 PRO/8930 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources