AGCO-ALLIS 9690 or Case-IH MX 210?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9690 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MX 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH MX 210 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 77% (63.6 L/min / 16.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 105% (3,890 kg / 8,576 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9690 | MX 210 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 145.6 kW (195.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 147.1 kW (197.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9690 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MX 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9690 and the MX 210. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9690 and the MX 210. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 82.5 L/min (21.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 146.1 L/min (38.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 210 has 77% more hydraulic flow (63.6 L/min / 16.8 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,707 kg (8,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 7,597 kg (16,749 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 210 has 105% more lift (3,890 kg / 8,576 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,210 kg (18,100 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 9,165 kg (20,205 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 210 is 12% heavier (955 kg / 2,105 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9690. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9690 and the MX 210. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 210 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX210”; OECD test report 2184, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1995 | 2002–2005 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 210 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MX 210 has 77% more hydraulic flow (63.6 L/min / 16.8 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 210 has 105% more lift (3,890 kg / 8,576 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 210 is 12% heavier (955 kg / 2,105 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MX 210 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Case-IH MX 210 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9690 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MX 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources