AGCO-ALLIS 9675 or New Holland TM 175 (Traktorenlexikon)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 175 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9675 | TM 175 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 130.2 kW (174.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 130.2 kW (174.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 175 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9675 and the TM 175. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9675 and the TM 175. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 106.4 L/min (28.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 102.1 L/min (27.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,866 kg (6,318 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 7,507 kg (16,550 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 9675: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”); the TM 175: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,604 kg (14,559 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 7,165 kg (15,796 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9675. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 18 to 19Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9675 and the TM 175. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | AheadThe New Holland TM 175 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175”; OECD test report 2142, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1998 | 2002–2007 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TM 175 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TM 175 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The New Holland TM 175 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 175 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 9675: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”); the TM 175: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM 175”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources