AGCO-ALLIS 9675 or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 175 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (11.5 L/min / 3.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 249% (7,134 kg / 15,728 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGCO-ALLIS 9675 and Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3, with the call on each
Question9675Agrotron 175 MK3Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?130.2 kW (174.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”128.8 kW (172.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 175 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9675 and the Agrotron 175 MK3.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9675 and the Agrotron 175 MK3.
Which pumps more oil for implements?106.4 L/min (28.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”117.9 L/min (31.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 has 11% more hydraulic flow (11.5 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,866 kg (6,318 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 has 249% more lift (7,134 kg / 15,728 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,604 kg (14,559 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”7,460 kg (16,446 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 is 13% heavier (856 kg / 1,887 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9675.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9675 and the Agrotron 175 MK3.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–19982001–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 has 11% more hydraulic flow (11.5 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 has 249% more lift (7,134 kg / 15,728 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 is 13% heavier (856 kg / 1,887 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 175 MK3 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 175 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources