AGCO-ALLIS 9655 or Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9655 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGCO-ALLIS 9655 and Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A), with the call on each
Question9655MF 3655 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?115.5 kW (154.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655”114.1 kW (153.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9655 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9655 and the MF 3655 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9655 and the MF 3655 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?77.6 L/min (20.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655”50.6 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 9655 has 53% more hydraulic flow (27.0 L/min / 7.1 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,682 kg (5,913 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655”6,400 kg (14,110 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) has 139% more lift (3,718 kg / 8,197 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9655 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?7,350 kg (16,204 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655”5,360 kg (11,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 9655 is 37% heavier (1,990 kg / 4,387 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9655.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655”16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9655 and the MF 3655 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3655”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–19981990–1995EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGCO-ALLIS 9655 has 53% more hydraulic flow (27.0 L/min / 7.1 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) has 139% more lift (3,718 kg / 8,197 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9655 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The AGCO-ALLIS 9655 is 37% heavier (1,990 kg / 4,387 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3655 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9655 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3655 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources