AGCO-ALLIS 9455 vs Claas Arion 640

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

AGCO-ALLIS 9455

1994–1999

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Claas Arion 640

2008–2013

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (Two-wheel or four-wheel drive; 4WD); they were not built in overlapping years (1994–1999; 2008–2013). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

7 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

AGCO-ALLIS 9455 and Claas Arion 640, field by field
Field9455Arion 640Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed154.9 hp153 hp
Engine declaredDETROIT-DIESEL DT-466
Displacement declared7.61 L
Maximum torque declared487 lb·ft · 660 N·m485 lb·ft · 657 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredOil cooled wet multi disc clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredClosed centreOpen centrediffers
Hydraulic control declaredLoad sensing
Pump flow declared32.2 gpm · 121.9 L/min29.1 gpm · 110 L/min+11% 9455
Pressure declared3,046 psi · 210 bar2,901 psi · 200 bar
Three-point lift at ends declared12,088 lb · 5,483 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540/1000 rpm
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared13,856 lb · 6,285 kg13,801 lb · 6,260 kg
Wheelbase declared123.2 in · 3,129 mm111.0 in · 2,820 mm+11% 9455
Length declared179.5 in · 4,560 mm203.0 in · 5,155 mm+13% Arion 640
Width declared88.0 in · 2,235 mm100.4 in · 2,550 mm+14% Arion 640
Height declared118.9 in · 3,020 mm118.4 in · 3,007 mm
Ground clearance declared19.7 in · 501 mm
Fuel tank declared304.3 qt · 288.0 L348.7 qt · 330 L+15% Arion 640

AGCO-ALLIS 9455 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9455”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9435”

Claas Arion 640 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Arion 640”
  • Source: OECD test report 2715, 2012
  • Source: OECD test report 2715, 2012