AGCO-ALLIS 9190 or John Deere 8110 T?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8110 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 8110T suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 14% (14.5 L/min / 3.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 38% (1,363 kg / 3,005 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9190 | 8110 T | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 144.2 kW (193.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 143.5 kW (192.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8110 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9190 and the 8110 T. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9190 and the 8110 T. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 105.9 L/min (28.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 120.4 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | AheadThe John Deere 8110T has 14% more hydraulic flow (14.5 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,613 kg (7,965 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 4,976 kg (10,971 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | AheadThe John Deere 8110T has 38% more lift (1,363 kg / 3,005 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,530 kg (16,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 10,727 kg (23,649 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8110T is 42% heavier (3,197 kg / 7,048 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 14,288 kg (31,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9190. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9190 and the 8110 T. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | TracksTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | DifferDrive differs: the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 Two-wheel or four-wheel drive and the John Deere 8110T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1991–1992 | 2000–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8110T is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 8110T has 14% more hydraulic flow (14.5 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 8110T has 38% more lift (1,363 kg / 3,005 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 8110T is 42% heavier (3,197 kg / 7,048 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 8110T is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Drive differs: the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 Two-wheel or four-wheel drive and the John Deere 8110T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8110 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources