AGCO-ALLIS 9190 or Hürlimann SX 2000?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SX 2000 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Hürlimann SX 2000 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 177% (6,387 kg / 14,081 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Hürlimann SX 2000 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9190 | SX 2000 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 144.2 kW (193.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 143.4 kW (192.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 2000” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SX 2000 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9190 and the SX 2000. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9190 and the SX 2000. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 105.9 L/min (28.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the SX 2000. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,613 kg (7,965 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 2000” | AheadThe Hürlimann SX 2000 has 177% more lift (6,387 kg / 14,081 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,530 kg (16,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 2000” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9190 and the SX 2000. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 2000” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9190 and the SX 2000. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 2000” | AheadThe Hürlimann SX 2000 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 2000” | AheadThe Hürlimann SX 2000 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the SX 2000. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9190” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 2000” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1991–1992 | 2000–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann SX 2000 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann SX 2000 has 177% more lift (6,387 kg / 14,081 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann SX 2000 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann SX 2000 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9190 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Hürlimann SX 2000 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SX 2000 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources