AGCO-ALLIS 8630 or Lamborghini R.1306 DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8630 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1306 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGCO-ALLIS 8630 and Lamborghini R.1306 DT, with the call on each
Question8630R.1306 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?95.6 kW (128.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”95.6 kW (128.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1306 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8630 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1306 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8630 and the R.1306 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8630 and the R.1306 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?61.2 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”66.2 L/min (17.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1306 DT”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,962 kg (10,939 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1306 DT”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,035 kg (11,100 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”5,525 kg (12,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1306 DT”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R.1306 DT.
Which has the wider choice of gears?24 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1306 DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8630 and the R.1306 DT.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1306 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1306 DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1306 DT”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8630”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1306 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1991–19972004–Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R.1306 DT is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Lamborghini R.1306 DT is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8630 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1306 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources