AGCO-ALLIS 7650 or Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 7650 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo suits road haulage better on this data: 18% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 7650 | IN-trac 6.60 Turbo | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 109.6 kW (147.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 7650” | 110 kW (148 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7650 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 7650 and the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 7650 and the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 56.0 L/min (14.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 7650. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,409 kg (9,720 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 7650” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,700 kg (12,566 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 7650” | 6,300 kg (13,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo is 11% heavier (600 kg / 1,323 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 7650 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 7650” | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 7650 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 7650” | 18 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7650. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 7650” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 7650” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 7650” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 7650” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1991–1994 | 1986–1991 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 7650 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo is 11% heavier (600 kg / 1,323 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 7650 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 7650 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 7650 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 7650 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources