AGCO-ALLIS 5680 or VALMET 6100-4?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 5680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6100-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The VALMET 6100-4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 98% (39.8 L/min / 10.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 41% (1,275 kg / 2,811 lb) more three-point lift.
- The VALMET 6100-4 suits road haulage better on this data: 21% (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5680 | 6100-4 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 58.8 kW (78.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | 58.1 kW (77.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6100-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5680 and the 6100-4. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5680 and the 6100-4. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.5 L/min (10.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | 80.3 L/min (21.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100” | AheadThe VALMET 6100-4 has 98% more hydraulic flow (39.8 L/min / 10.5 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 5680 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,080 kg (6,790 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | 4,355 kg (9,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100” | AheadThe VALMET 6100-4 has 41% more lift (1,275 kg / 2,811 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 5680 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,025 kg (6,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 6100-4 is 32% heavier (975 kg / 2,150 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 5680 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | 6,300 kg (13,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100” | AheadThe VALMET 6100-4 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 5680 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | 12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5680 and the 6100-4. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 6100-4. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5680” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6100” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1991–1997 | 1991–1994 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The VALMET 6100-4 has 98% more hydraulic flow (39.8 L/min / 10.5 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 5680 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 6100-4 has 41% more lift (1,275 kg / 2,811 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 5680 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 6100-4 is 32% heavier (975 kg / 2,150 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 5680 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 6100-4 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 5680 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6100-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources