AGCO-ALLIS 5660 or AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 5660 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80-56 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The AGCO-ALLIS 5660 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 64% (14.0 L/min / 3.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The AGCO-ALLIS 5660 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGCO-ALLIS 5660 and AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT), with the call on each
Question566080-56 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5660”42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5660 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80-56 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5660 and the 80-56 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5660 and the 80-56 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5660”22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 5660 has 64% more hydraulic flow (14.0 L/min / 3.7 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,055 kg (4,530 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5660”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 80-56 (DT).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,265 kg (4,993 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5660”2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5660 and the 80-56 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5660”12Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5660 and the 80-56 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5660”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 5660 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5660”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 5660 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5660”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 5660”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 80-56”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–19991980–1986Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 5660 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGCO-ALLIS 5660 has 64% more hydraulic flow (14.0 L/min / 3.7 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The AGCO-ALLIS 5660 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The AGCO-ALLIS 5660 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL 80-56 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The AGCO-ALLIS 5660 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 5660 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 80-56 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources