ZETOR 95 or ZETOR Proxima 100 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Proxima 100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR 95 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The ZETOR 95 suits road haulage better on this data: 48% (2,600 kg / 5,732 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 95 | Proxima 100 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | 66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Proxima 100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 95 and the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 95 and the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 58.5 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | 48.3 L/min (12.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | AheadThe ZETOR 95 has 21% more hydraulic flow (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,850 kg (12,897 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,660 kg (10,274 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | 3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 95 is 39% heavier (1,310 kg / 2,888 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | AheadThe ZETOR 95 has 48% higher maximum permissible mass (2,600 kg / 5,732 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | 10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 95 and the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Forterra 95” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2009–2012 | 2011–2016 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 95 has 21% more hydraulic flow (10.2 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 95 is 39% heavier (1,310 kg / 2,888 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 95 has 48% higher maximum permissible mass (2,600 kg / 5,732 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Proxima 100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources