ZETOR 6711 or ZETOR 6911/6945?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the ZETOR 6911/6945: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.
- The ZETOR 6911/6945 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The ZETOR 6911/6945 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (4.3 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6711 | 6911/6945 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711” | 40.8 kW (54.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6911” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6711 and the 6911/6945. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6711 and the 6911/6945. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711” | 24.3 L/min (6.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6911” | AheadThe ZETOR 6911/6945 has 22% more hydraulic flow (4.3 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the ZETOR 6711 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 3,510 kg (7,738 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6911” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 6711. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,620 kg (5,776 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711” | 2,870 kg (6,327 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6911” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6711 and the 6911/6945. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711” | 10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6911” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6711 and the 6911/6945. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6911” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6911” | AheadThe ZETOR 6911/6945 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 6711 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 6711 and the 6911/6945. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6711” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6911” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1972–1977 | 1977–1980 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 6911/6945 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 6911/6945 has 22% more hydraulic flow (4.3 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the ZETOR 6711 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 6911/6945 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 6711 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The ZETOR 6911/6945 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources