ZETOR 5011 or ZETOR 5211/5245?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the ZETOR 5211/5245: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on PTO speeds and drive.
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 153% (35.7 L/min / 9.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 5011 | 5211/5245 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 29.8 kW (40.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011” | 29.9 kW (40.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 5011 and the 5211/5245. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 5011 and the 5211/5245. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 23.3 L/min (6.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011” | 59.0 L/min (15.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | AheadThe ZETOR 5211/5245 has 153% more hydraulic flow (35.7 L/min / 9.4 gpm) than the ZETOR 5011 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,070 kg (2,359 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011” | 1,750 kg (3,858 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 5011: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011”); the 5211/5245: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,670 kg (5,886 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011” | 2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5011 and the 5211/5245. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 5011 and the 5211/5245. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | AheadThe ZETOR 5211/5245 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 5011 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 5211/5245. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211” | AheadThe ZETOR 5211/5245 is available with four-wheel drive; the ZETOR 5011 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1980–1984 | 1984–1993 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 has 153% more hydraulic flow (35.7 L/min / 9.4 gpm) than the ZETOR 5011 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 5011 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The ZETOR 5211/5245 is available with four-wheel drive; the ZETOR 5011 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 5011: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5011”); the 5211/5245: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5211”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources