ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) or ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 10641 (2002-2007) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 (2007-2009) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (800 kg / 1,764 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 10641 (2002-2007) | 10641 (2007-2009) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 74.3 kW (99.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | 74.3 kW (99.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 10641 (2002-2007) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 (2007-2009) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 10641 (2002-2007) and the 10641 (2007-2009). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 10641 (2002-2007) and the 10641 (2007-2009). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | 69.6 L/min (18.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,782 kg (12,747 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | 5,850 kg (12,897 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,275 kg (9,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | 4,660 kg (10,274 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | 8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 10641 (2002-2007) and the 10641 (2007-2009). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2007-2009)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2007 | 2007–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10641 (2007-2009) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 10641 (2002-2007) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 (2007-2009) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources