WHITE 4-180 or WHITE 4-210?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 4-180 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4-210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 4-180 | 4-210 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 156.7 kW (210.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-180” | 154.4 kW (207.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-210” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4-180 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4-210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 4-180 and the 4-210. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 4-180 and the 4-210. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 4-180 and the 4-210. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,722 kg (6,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-180” | 2,903 kg (6,400 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-210” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 9,344 kg (20,600 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-180” | 10,766 kg (23,735 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-210” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 4-210 is 15% heavier (1,422 kg / 3,135 lb) than the WHITE 4-180 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4-180 and the 4-210. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-180” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-210” | AheadThe WHITE 4-210 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the WHITE 4-180 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 4-180 and the 4-210. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-180” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 4-210” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 4-180” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 4-210” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 4-180” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 4-210” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 4-180” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 4-210” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1975–1978 | 1978–1983 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 4-210 is 15% heavier (1,422 kg / 3,135 lb) than the WHITE 4-180 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 4-210 has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the WHITE 4-180 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 4-180 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4-210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources