WHITE 2-65 or ZETOR 7245 H?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 2-65 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7245 H has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 2-65 | 7245 H | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 46.3 kW (62.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-65” | 46.6 kW (62.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2-65 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7245 H has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 2-65 and the 7245 H. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 2-65 and the 7245 H. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 56.6 L/min (15.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-65. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,707 kg (3,763 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-65” | 2,448 kg (5,397 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 2-65: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-65”); the 7245 H: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,410 kg (5,313 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-65” | 3,835 kg (8,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 7245H is 59% heavier (1,425 kg / 3,142 lb) than the WHITE 2-65 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2-65 and the 7245 H. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-65” | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-65” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 7245 H. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-65” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-65” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H” | AheadThe ZETOR 7245H offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-65 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2-65. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-65” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1982–1988 | 1984–1993 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 7245H is 59% heavier (1,425 kg / 3,142 lb) than the WHITE 2-65 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 7245H offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the WHITE 2-65 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 2-65 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7245 H has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 2-65: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-65”); the 7245 H: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7245 H”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources