WHITE 2-30 vs WHITE 2-32

4 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

WHITE 2-30

1979–1984

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

WHITE 2-32

1984–1986

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 2-30 and the 2-32 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

4 material differences · 8 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

WHITE 2-30 and WHITE 2-32, field by field
Field2-302-32Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed26.7 hp27.6 hp
Engine declaredISUZU 4 FA 1
Displacement declared1.49 L
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6 mph · 30 km/h13.7 mph · 22 km/h+36% 2-30
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredOpen centreOpen centre
Pump flow declared6.6 gpm · 25.0 L/min
Three-point lift at ends declared2,712 lb · 1,230 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540 rpm540 rpm
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared2,624 lb · 1,190 kg2,915 lb · 1,322 kg+11% 2-32
Wheelbase declared69.0 in · 1,753 mm70.9 in · 1,801 mm
Length declared122.0 in · 3,099 mm126.1 in · 3,203 mm
Width declared67.0 in · 1,702 mm71.5 in · 1,816 mm+7% 2-32
Height declared79.0 in · 2,007 mm78.8 in · 2,002 mm
Ground clearance declared14.0 in · 356 mm14.2 in · 361 mm
Turning radius, braked declared8.8 ft · 2.67 m8.4 ft · 2.57 m
Fuel tank declared31.7 qt · 30.0 L42.3 qt · 40.0 L+33% 2-32

WHITE 2-30 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-30”

WHITE 2-32 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-32”