WHITE 1365 or ZETOR Super 50?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the WHITE 1365: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on drive.
- The WHITE 1365 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 74% (9.3 L/min / 2.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1365 | Super 50 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 35.2 kW (47.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 1370” | 35.7 kW (47.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 50 Super” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1365 and the Super 50. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1365 and the Super 50. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 1370” | 12.5 L/min (3.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 50 Super” | AheadThe WHITE 1365 has 74% more hydraulic flow (9.3 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the ZETOR Super 50 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 50 Super” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1365. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,250 kg (4,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 1370” | 2,740 kg (6,041 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 50 Super” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR Super 50 is 22% heavier (490 kg / 1,080 lb) than the WHITE 1365 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1365 and the Super 50. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “White 1370” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 50 Super” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1365 and the Super 50. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 1370” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 50 Super” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 1370” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 50 Super” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 50 Super” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1365. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 1370” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 50 Super” | AheadThe WHITE 1365 is available with four-wheel drive; the ZETOR Super 50 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1971–1975 | 1960–1968 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 1365 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The WHITE 1365 has 74% more hydraulic flow (9.3 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the ZETOR Super 50 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR Super 50 is 22% heavier (490 kg / 1,080 lb) than the WHITE 1365 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 1365 is available with four-wheel drive; the ZETOR Super 50 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The WHITE 1365 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources