Warchalowski WT 20 or Warchalowski WT-21?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the WT 20 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the WT-21 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Warchalowski WT 20 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 51% (430 kg / 948 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Warchalowski WT-21 suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | WT 20 | WT-21 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 13.2 kW (17.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 20” | 13.2 kW (17.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 21” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the WT 20 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the WT-21 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the WT 20 and the WT-21. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the WT 20 and the WT-21. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the WT 20 and the WT-21. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,280 kg (2,822 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 20” | 850 kg (1,874 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 21” | AheadThe Warchalowski WT 20 has 51% more lift (430 kg / 948 lb) than the Warchalowski WT-21 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 885 kg (1,951 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 20” | 855 kg (1,885 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 21” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the WT 20 and the WT-21. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5 to 6Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 20” | 5 to 6Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 21” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the WT 20 and the WT-21. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 20” | 28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 21” | AheadThe Warchalowski WT-21 has 12% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Warchalowski WT 20 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 20” | 540/700 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 21” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 20” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 21” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 20” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 21” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1958–1968 | 1968–1969 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Warchalowski WT-21 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Warchalowski WT 20 has 51% more lift (430 kg / 948 lb) than the Warchalowski WT-21 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Warchalowski WT-21 has 12% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Warchalowski WT 20 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Warchalowski WT-21 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the WT 20 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the WT-21 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources