WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B vs Zickler 3754
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the WT-32 B and the 3754 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
8 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | WT-32 B | 3754 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 29.6 hp | 30 hp | — |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144 | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 2.36 L | — | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 105 lb·ft · 142 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | 11.7 mph · 18.79 km/h | +60% WT-32 B |
| Clutch declared | Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single plate clutch type K-16 | Single-plate dry clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,968 lb · 1,800 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 588 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,417 lb · 1,550 kg | 2,315 lb · 1,050 kg | +48% WT-32 B |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 3,726 lb · 1,690 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 77.6 in · 1,970 mm | 54.3 in · 1,380 mm | +43% WT-32 B |
| Length declared | 128.3 in · 3,260 mm | — | — |
| Width declared | 60.2 in · 1,530 mm | 36.2 in · 920 mm | +66% WT-32 B |
| Height declared | 59.8 in · 1,520 mm | 41.3 in · 1,050 mm | +45% WT-32 B |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.6 in · 395 mm | 9.1 in · 230 mm | +72% WT-32 B |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 6.4 ft · 1.95 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 38.0 qt · 36.0 L | — | — |
WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 32B”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-250”
Zickler 3754 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754”